![]() ![]() The only other currently viable option is Intel’s integrated GPU (iGPU) accelerator known as QuickSync. From here on out, we’ll just refer to it as “NVENC.” Simply put, it’s a very common and easy solution to enable hardware transcoding. This is what Nvidia calls its decoding and encoding engines. Most often, Nvidia GPUs are often recommended for hardware transcoding via NVDEC/NVENC. #I7 with quicksync software#More importantly, however - hardware transcoding has more limitations, considerations, and compatibility issues than software transcoding. Generally, hardware transcoding is faster and more efficient than software transcoding. This reduces load on the CPU, allowing you to allocate its resources to other things such as Dockers, VMs, or other applications. However, when someone talks about hardware transcoding, they mean using a dedicated piece of hardware (typically a GPU) to accelerate the process. Technically, all transcoding is software in the end. Note: certain file formats like VC1 are limited to single threaded transcoding only. (think of dual CPU systems like the Lego build and the Anniversary build) It’s a multi-threaded process which can take advantage of not only multiple threads, but also multiple phyiscal CPUs. Typically this is accomplished via software run on the CPU of the Plex server. Think of decoding as taking the file apart, and encoding as putting it back together. Simply put, it’s the combination of two processes: decoding and encoding. You’re looking for more transcoding power (this does not affect direct play or direct stream).You have an existing NAS with all of your media on it (this guide will use Unraid as an example).The hardware portion of this guide assumes: Ultimately, the recommendation will be to add a dedicated transcoding box that uses Intel QuickSync. The guide will also provide recommendations for adding hardware transcoding to your existing setup. We did have a chance to run the latest beta of HandBrake, which is now available in Quick Sync- and OpenCL-optimized trim, on Intel’s Core i7s and AMD’s A10-5800K.The purpose of this guide is to give an overview of hardware transcoding with Plex. Meanwhile, the fastest TU7 should be faster, higher-quality, and more battery-friendly for mobile devices on HD Graphics 4600 than 4000. But at the highest-quality TU1 setting, HD Graphics 4600 is significantly better looking than 4000. ![]() Really, the intricacies deserve a story of their own. Haswell’s implementation mixes in more speed and configurable quality dials.įor example, previous versions of Quick Sync exposed three pre-defined blends of performance and quality that Intel calls target usages. Intel followed up with an improved version of Quick Sync on Ivy Bridge ( discussed here) that seemed to introduce mostly performance-oriented enhancements. There’s quite a bit to discuss when it comes to Intel’s Quick Sync feature, which I introduced on this page in Intel’s Second-Gen Core CPUs: The Sandy Bridge Review. I’m at least happy to see the company using HD Graphics 4600 across its product line, where it previously armed lower-end chips with stripped-down graphics engines. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |